Skip to content

IDL View: The performance questions raised by the PRA’s solvent exit rules

The PRA’s new Solvent Exit Analysis requirements are prompting insurers to think about how they would leave the market. More importantly, our co-founder Matt Scott argues that they highlight the need for firms to understand their long-term performance, resilience and competitive position before an exit ever becomes necessary.

From 30 June 2026, UK insurers will be required to have a Solvent Exit Analysis (SEA) in place, setting out how they could leave the market in an orderly way while remaining solvent.

While the new PRA requirements focus on planning for a potential exit, they also raise a more fundamental question: How does an insurer know when its business model is no longer sustainable?

Answering that question requires more than a contingency plan. It requires a deep understanding of financial performance, capital resilience, and how an insurer compares with its peers.

Solvent exit is about more than failure

The phrase solvent exit may sound dramatic, but the PRA’s requirements are not aimed solely at insurers in distress.

A solvent exit could arise from a strategic decision to withdraw from a market, cease writing a particular class of business, or run off a portfolio that no longer meets an insurer’s objectives. In other words, insurers need to understand not only whether they can continue trading, but whether they should.

That distinction is important.

An insurer may remain solvent for years while delivering consistently poor underwriting results, eroding capital, or underperforming its peers. Identifying those trends early gives management teams more options and more time to act.

The importance of performance indicators

As part of their planning, insurers will need to consider the indicators that could suggest a solvent exit may become a realistic option.

Many of these indicators are already familiar to boards and executive teams:

  • Persistent underwriting losses
  • Deteriorating combined operating ratios
  • Weak long-term profitability
  • Erosion of capital strength
  • Underperformance relative to peers
  • Failure to improve despite market hardening

The challenge is not identifying these metrics. It is understanding what they mean in the context of the wider market.

A combined operating ratio of 98% may be acceptable in one sector and concerning in another. A period of declining profitability may reflect broader market conditions, or it may indicate company-specific issues.

Without robust benchmarking, it can be difficult to tell the difference.

Data-driven decision making

This is where independent market data becomes increasingly valuable.

Insurance DataLab’s insight platform already tracks many of the performance indicators that insurers are likely to consider when assessing long-term viability, including:

  • Combined operating ratio performance
  • Three-year aggregate underwriting results
  • Performance improvement and deterioration trends
  • Market benchmarking
  • Growth metrics
  • Solvency II capital information

Viewed together, these measures provide a clearer picture of an insurer’s resilience and competitive position.

They help answer questions such as:

  • Are we improving or falling behind?
  • How do we compare with our peers?
  • Is underperformance temporary or structural?
  • Are we creating sustainable value through underwriting?

These are not just regulatory questions. They are strategic ones too.

A new reason to focus on the fundamentals

The PRA’s solvent exit planning requirements are unlikely to create a wave of insurers preparing to leave the market.

What they will do is encourage boards to think more critically about business sustainability, performance trends, and resilience.

For many firms, that process will reinforce the importance of having access to reliable, independent performance data.

The insurers best placed to navigate future challenges will not be those with the thickest exit plans sitting on a shelf. They will be the ones with the clearest understanding of their business, their market position, and the risks that could threaten their long-term success.

In that respect, solvent exit planning is not really about preparing to leave the market.It is about understanding what it takes to remain in it.

How Insurance DataLab can help

Insurance DataLab provides independent benchmarking across the UK insurance market, helping firms assess underwriting performance, capital resilience, growth trends and long-term sustainability against both individual competitors and the wider market.

As insurers respond to the PRA’s new solvent exit requirements, access to reliable, independent performance data can help boards and management teams better understand their competitive position, identify emerging risks and assess whether performance challenges are temporary or indicative of deeper structural issues.

Whether firms are evaluating underwriting results, monitoring performance trends or assessing their long-term strategic viability, independent benchmarking provides valuable context for decision-making.

If you would like to see how the platform can support your strategic and regulatory objectives, you can request a demo here.